Book structure/chapters/content
|
Posted
|
|
|---|---|
|
Community saint |
I look forward to seeing your suggestion. Bob |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
I am interested in seeing what Fletch proposes but I do like this idea. I was planning on having the installation section mention about creating a test site but I failed to put it in the outline. I think we should be more forceful with this suggestion as it solves a lot of issues and prepares the user for testing and upgrading in the future. I'll add creating a test site to the installation section. This is an A+ suggestion in my book, sholzy. Bob |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
I've warmed to the idea, despite my initial reluctance to ask a prospective 'new' user (let's forget the 'newbie' reference for a bit) to build TWO sites. However, properly explained, the "follow my explanation" approach will 'hand-hold' the user through the various changes discussed in the PDF/Book, culminating in a full-blown test site designed for them, by us, which they can ultimately use to do their own experimentation. The other advantage, of course, is that they do it at their own speed. I can still show an example of what I had in mind, which goes along the lines of "at the end of this chapter you will …", and although it suggests a bit of a text-book approach, it would avoid confusion when viewing a site in the process of metamorphosis from 'plain-vanilla install' to 'completed journey' pausing at each milestone! Still considering submitting this idea, but I think sholzy has just taken the wind out of my sails …!!
Take my advice. I'm not using it!
View my working ocPortal site (version 9.x.x) at Anglo-Indian Portal |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
This idea isn't new. It was started almost 2 weeks ago by Duck and then me a few days later. Give the reader the tools he needs to do the job the correct way right from the start.
Steve
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
I know the idea is not new, but, for me, it just got overshadowed by other considerations, especially as I was content to put the companion site on the back burner. I'm pleased that you were persistent and that we now will have a stronger product as a result. Bob |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
We will need to make certain that any sources we use are open-source or that we get permission to use them. Bob |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
Yeah, me too! I started to 'build' the alternative I had in mind, but it occurred to me that I already have a 'working' example:
Does that convey my thinking sufficiently?
Take my advice. I'm not using it!
View my working ocPortal site (version 9.x.x) at Anglo-Indian Portal |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
I left myself a 'knot-in-my-handkerchief' in another post, so best I get it out here while I still remember why I tied the knot in the first place …!! In the 'Troubleshooting' section of each chapter, please remind the prospective user that, when things go TU (and they will), that one of the things they should check is that they haven't got 'overrides' in their '_custom' folders that are causing an issue. Especially with upgrades …!! P.S. I just realised that you 'might' get to read this in a hospital bed. If that is the case, please forgive my insensitivity, and I will only expect a response when you've been discharged without any further complications. And don't dismiss that wheelchair - apparently it's for 'their' protection!
Take my advice. I'm not using it!
View my working ocPortal site (version 9.x.x) at Anglo-Indian Portal |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
(Seems right and I agree with Duck at first consideration, but after more reflection, I think it is the opposite. Read further down)
This is where I totally disagree with Duck's observation on the importance of an example website. Before starting with such an elaborate project I would want to see the final product in great details, and after completion I would still want to compare my achievement with the original to see where I may have come short, or possibly even did better. So yes in this light, a reference sight is very important to showcase ocPortal's potential to neophytes. My experience as a teacher in this new world where catchy sell-words like simple; intuitive; effortless; trouble-free, are over used and more often miss-used, I've noticed that most students will start any project with a negative outlook. "Show me...prove to me it is worth my time" they seem to cry-out. An overwhelming number have lazy-minds, thinking that efforts are tedious and beyond their worth. If you do not hold their curiosity in the first wave, it is often too late as their short attention span will meander elsewhere. A BOOK! WOW! Who reads today beyond twitter and some blog headlines? (I'm being sarcastic, but surely this is a concerning pattern of a state of mind that cannot be overlooked while working on such a project.) To have an impact, the plan must offer clear insights into ocPortal, starting with a strong visual approach. Hook them with the look and guide them with short, fail proof tutorials, I'd say. I think that the First 6 chapters of the "BOOK" as elaborated by Bobs can be integrated within the example website and its follow-up extensions offered in other formats afterwards. The website peeks the curiosity, the chapters (map) bring the visitors to the how's and why's of the ocportal methodology for creating a viable presence on the web. The forums catch the comments and questions and the site adjusts and evolve around the concept. Sorry for the lateness of my comments, I've just come back from a limited to none Internet vacation. Jean |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
Harry digiflash | Photography,Webdesign and digital art community (dutch) |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
I agree, but I think it would be difficult providing admin access to multiple people at the same time without problems arising. How many concurrent users are able to log in as Admin? Can it be done without problems arising internally (like db corruption)? There may not even be enough users on at one time for it to even be a problem. I just think if you're making changes to the site and someone else logs in and starts doing the same thing, things could turn ugly quickly. This is why I believe it is better to teach the reader to make a test site so he/she can experiment all he/she wants without anyone else creating problems.
Steve
|
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
My proposed solution is to use the companion website, yes as a static kind of image representation of the final result, but through the power of the ocPortal engine it can go much deeper in providing what sholzy refers to as "teaching the reader how to create and use their own test setup. Let them build up their own test site in their own sandbox. Use the companion site for a visual reference for how a default install should look like with all blocks/addons included". I believe that these references can easily be presented as step by step tutorials using "Zones" which can accommodate multiple "themes". For instance, the initial setup tutorial is presented with the 'default theme' within its own zone. Zones can be created to give accurate representation for each level of instructions; immersing the reader with the correct environment during the processes. This is not like a true "sandbox", but it is the next best thing for someone interested in recreating his own. This approach would give each author the freedom to create an instructional theme (chapters) in his own computer and export it as a theme to be uploaded as an addon and attributed a zone on the official companion site. The Companion site's webmaster task to assemble the chapters is made easier as he juggle zone modules accompanied by introductions and linked through a book like index or menu. Corrections and updates by the authors are made easier by simply issuing a revised theme. |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
I'll take that as 'confirmation' of an idea I've put forward a couple of times before, e.g.
However, from the response to those 'suggestions' it appears that other members either don't get it, or feel it is too complicated. Perhaps a further discussion on the value of different presentations (ZONES), based on different actions taken in the Book/PDF could be of value if we are still considering a site to be referred to?
Take my advice. I'm not using it!
View my working ocPortal site (version 9.x.x) at Anglo-Indian Portal |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
WOW! YES! Jean |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
digiflash | Photography,Webdesign and digital art community (dutch) |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
A static site that has no interaction is nothing more than a duplicate picture of what you have already been provided. People are arguing that some people need a 3d view of things to understand it but a static non-interactive page is NOT 3d. Everything on your monitor is nothing but a 2D image! Compare these examples: Now click the link to Digiflash site and pretend you can't do anything there (no clicking links no commenting etc) http://digiflash.nl/ What is the difference I ask? What really was the point to it I ask? Next you talk about multiple Zones depicting Static images of various stages of development but again this seems like a waste of resources to me when there is already difficulty getting the volunteers to write chapters where you going to get the volunteers to set all these up and maintain them? For the 1 in 1000 person that just may find some use to seeing a duplicate picture of something they have already seen? I think that since a companion site is going to be gone to the trouble of building why not actually make it live? No Admin access will be given but site interactivity will be there. People can see it in operation. Watch how it has grown and evolved over time since it's development from the book. Revenue from Ads etc can be flowed into ocPortals coffers to help with development costs and perhaps even sold after a year or 2 for a considerable sum. But at least in the meantime people are looking at a REAL SITE and not a bunch of 2D images that are exact duplicates of the 2D images they have already seen. |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
If you are teaching the people to build the site on their test box and they are following along then they will have their own copy of the site to look at and won't need another copy on the web to look at anyway! Now you'll have just increased the redundancy and uselessness of the live (static locked) site as well. |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Fan in action |
Just my $28 worth (Oz inflation) as I AM your target audience: I used to design industrial training programs in the "Emerging World" and some were lulus: teaching literally primitive people how to weld Aluminium (even spelled incorrectly by N.Americans, just as a starter). I quickly learned some key things: As a general rule, nothing beats a demonstration. Teaching those people about the dangers of oxy-acetalyne, I blew some up, first thing. 1. Humans respond best by interest first. 2. Accessability second. 3. Application value third. 1. I am interested in this wizz of a program. BUT it has many competitors (even if not as good). The features layout was super interesting for its special extras. (I highlighted those in yellow!) 2. It wasn't as easy/straightforward to get to play with as e.g. WPress. ( It is disadvantaged by not being p-n-play via CPanel - a worthy big project to tackle as a priority.) I've commented elsewhere on that exercise. Jeans install WITH pictures via WAMP now seems a better bet than the inclusive install, which kinda got lost on my W7 PC. HANDS ON is vital for the psych profile of your main target in the freebie world! WE don't read manuals…… 3. What can it do for me? ( Women, money, prestige, solve a distinct need/problem) You can own a world class Website just like Jeans that does everything! Right NOW! THAT should be a RTG download. THAT's what I want. With everything including the kitchen sink pre-installed. (Later I can learn how to do even more magic things with it - personalise it - and muck it up… :-) ) That is when the proposed book is applicable: the gritty details. In minimum 2 distinct parts: USERS (Me) FIDDLERS (Developers) BTW: The thought put into the proposed book alone is very impressive. I'm sorry I don't have the time immediately to really input my results in depth as I go into this adventure, but I will when *I* get it all to work. Luckily, with my trusty Dragon speech-2-text program, my verbose posts are easy! :-) |
|
Posted
|
|
|
Community saint |
This is definitely a plus when it comes time to understand human reaction to "New Concepts". I've had a similar experience teaching in 'Emerging Worlds" from Africa to the Caribbean for the past 35 years and can relate to your sense of priority.
"What can it do for me? ( Women, money, prestige, solve a distinct need/problem)" is without doubt the most important factor in the decision making of most people and the response to my students that got me the most attention was always: "If it can get you a better job, you will be more attractive to Women." This was particularly important in Africa when it was still very popular to be able to have 4 wives.lol.
This solution already exist, but unfortunately very few people are aware of it because of their initial desire to save when it comes to finding a host server and a great deal of skepticism about Web Hosting claims to be honest brokers . The recommended Host by ocPortal: eLief is one of the best there is for hosting an ocPortal website. Each plan includes a cPanel with a 1-Click ocPortal installer, full backups and the very important feature of Cloning your site at the click of a button. Another useful feature is free CloudFlare which protects and accelerates your website online. I've experienced eLief for the past 3 years and can vouch for its outstanding value when it comes to setting an ocPortal website that works.
I can't agree more that "Hands on" is the way to go. It cannot be just a book, it has to be a combination of multimedia tools. But as a book it must start, and gain any sense of purpose when supported by a solid website for the "hands on" part. Jean |
1 guests and 0 members have just viewed this: None
Control functions:








